Moggerhanger

We welcome the Council's assessment of site NLP305 which demonstrated that there were no reasons why the site could not be considered further within the allocation process.
As noted in the site assessment framework, the landscape impacts of any proposal is thought to be a key consideration of any development coming forward. We have therefore produced a masterplan sketch demonstrating how this land could be developed to accommodate a minimum of 20 dwellings. We also wish to revise the site area for this site submission to include the tree belt to the north of the site which is also within the client's control. This increases the size of the site submission to approx. 1 ha of land. The inclusion of this land will allow the effective management and long term survival of the treebelt which will help maintain the landscape character of the area.

It is intended that the dwellings proposed will range from 2-4/5 bedroom properties.

The amended site and proposed site plan are attached for your information.

We welcome the Council's assessment of site NLP 159 which demonstrated that there were no reasons why the site could not be considered further within the allocation process.
As noted in the site assessment framework, the landscape impacts of any proposal is thought to be a key consideration of any development coming forward. We have therefore produced a masterplan sketch demonstrating how this land could be developed to accommodate a minimum of 40 dwellings. We also wish to revise the site area for this site submission to include the tree belt to the north of the site which is also within the landowner's ownership. This increases the size of the site submission to approx. 2 ha of land. The inclusion of this land will allow the effective management and long term survival of the treebelt which will help maintain the landscape character of the area.

It is intended that the dwellings proposed will range from 2-4/5 bedroom properties.

The amended site and proposed site plan are attached for your information.

Please see document attached

I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

ALP461. I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

ALP 561. I believe that the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

ALP475.I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development
on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

ALP 475. I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely and fully support them.

ALP 476. I believe the reasons given by CBC for refusing development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

ALP476.(Site B) I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development
on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

ALP461. I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development
on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.
(Please note I incorrectly sent a representation as above with the incorrect reference number of ALP561. My apologies, please ignore it!)

Please see document attached

We welcome the Council's assessment of site NLP305 which demonstrated that there were no reasons why the site could not be considered further within the allocation process.
As noted in the site assessment framework, the landscape impacts of any proposal is thought to be a key consideration of any development coming forward. We have therefore produced a masterplan sketch demonstrating how this land could be developed to accommodate a minimum of 20 dwellings. We also wish to revise the site area for this site submission to include the tree belt to the north of the site which is also within the client's control. This increases the size of the site submission to approx. 1 ha of land. The inclusion of this land will allow the effective management and long term survival of the treebelt which will help maintain the landscape character of the area.

It is intended that the dwellings proposed will range from 2-4/5 bedroom properties.

The amended site and proposed site plan are attached for your information.

We welcome the Council's assessment of site NLP 159 which demonstrated that there were no reasons why the site could not be considered further within the allocation process.
As noted in the site assessment framework, the landscape impacts of any proposal is thought to be a key consideration of any development coming forward. We have therefore produced a masterplan sketch demonstrating how this land could be developed to accommodate a minimum of 40 dwellings. We also wish to revise the site area for this site submission to include the tree belt to the north of the site which is also within the landowner's ownership. This increases the size of the site submission to approx. 2 ha of land. The inclusion of this land will allow the effective management and long term survival of the treebelt which will help maintain the landscape character of the area.

It is intended that the dwellings proposed will range from 2-4/5 bedroom properties.

The amended site and proposed site plan are attached for your information.