Central Bedfordshire & Luton Stage 1 & 2 Green Belt Study

Showing comments and forms 1 to 8 of 8

Object

Technical Reports

Representation ID: 10064

Received: 22/02/2018

Respondent: Hearne Holmes Developments Ltd

Agent: DLP Planning Limited

Representation:

METHODOLOGY - Dispute GB assessment for alternative site (Toddington); should be assessed to provide alternate options where only part of area is assessed, which would result in a more accurate assessment

04

Full text:

Please see full attached representation

Object

Technical Reports

Representation ID: 10066

Received: 22/02/2018

Respondent: Hearne Holmes Development

Agent: DLA Town Planning Ltd

Representation:

METHODOLOGY - Dispute conclusion re Proposal Site (Toddington) which is not considered to contribute significantly to any of the Green belt purposes and is primarily associated with the surrounding urbanising elements

04

Full text:

Please see attached report

Attachments:

Object

Technical Reports

Representation ID: 10914

Received: 22/02/2018

Respondent: Barton Residents Action Group

Number of people: 7

Representation:

METHODOLOGY - Dispute conclusion of GB study; land at Barton should not be developed because performs strongly in GB study

04

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Comment

Technical Reports

Representation ID: 11494

Received: 22/02/2018

Respondent: Mr B. Brennan

Representation:

AMPTHILL

METHODOLOGY - Disagree with conclusions of Green Belt review around Ampthill which resulted in site being eliminated from consideration

04

Full text:

see attachment

Attachments:

Comment

Technical Reports

Representation ID: 11516

Received: 22/02/2018

Respondent: Ampthill Rugby Club

Agent: Aragon Land & Planning Ltd

Representation:

AMPTHILL

GREEN BELT - should be removed over Ampthill rugby club and replaced by the settlement envelope

04

Full text:

see attachment

Attachments:

Comment

Technical Reports

Representation ID: 12100

Received: 22/02/2018

Respondent: Mr Saxby

Agent: Aragon Land & Planning Ltd

Representation:

ASPLEY GUISE

GREEN BELT - Seeking alteration of Green Belt around Aspley Guisem see attachment for details

Full text:

see attachment

Attachments:

Comment

Technical Reports

Representation ID: 12358

Received: 22/02/2018

Respondent: Denison Investments

Agent: Arrow Planning

Representation:

METHODOLOGY - dispute the conclusions of the study in respect to Ampthill which in focussing on the wider parcel did not allow for consideration of particular characteristics / circumstances of this particular site

04

Full text:

see attachment

Attachments:

Support

Technical Reports

Representation ID: 14005

Received: 22/02/2018

Respondent: GPS Estates Ltd

Agent: Woods Hardwick Planning Ltd

Representation:

Support Green Belt review

Full text:

These representations are submitted on behalf of our Client, GPS Estates Ltd, who have significant concerns over the contents of the Pre-Submission Local Plan and the supporting evidence published with it. GPD Estates Ltd are of the view the plan does not currently meet the tests of soundness set out at paragraph 182 of the NPPF as it is not positively prepared, justified, effective or consistent with the NPPF as will be explained in detail in the representations attached.