Moggerhanger

Showing comments and forms 1 to 14 of 14

Comment

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 343

Received: 22/08/2017

Respondent: Red Eagle Securities

Agent: hd planning ltd

Representation:

We welcome the support for site NLP 305 to provide a minimum of 20 dwellings. We have provided additional information to include the tree belt to the north of the site within the site submission and also show how 20 dwellings could be provided along with green infrastructure and additional landscaping.

Full text:

We welcome the Council's assessment of site NLP305 which demonstrated that there were no reasons why the site could not be considered further within the allocation process.
As noted in the site assessment framework, the landscape impacts of any proposal is thought to be a key consideration of any development coming forward. We have therefore produced a masterplan sketch demonstrating how this land could be developed to accommodate a minimum of 20 dwellings. We also wish to revise the site area for this site submission to include the tree belt to the north of the site which is also within the client's control. This increases the size of the site submission to approx. 1 ha of land. The inclusion of this land will allow the effective management and long term survival of the treebelt which will help maintain the landscape character of the area.

It is intended that the dwellings proposed will range from 2-4/5 bedroom properties.

The amended site and proposed site plan are attached for your information.

Comment

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 344

Received: 22/08/2017

Respondent: Red Eagle Securities

Agent: hd planning ltd

Representation:

We welcome the support for site NLP159 to provide a minimum of 40 dwellings. We have provided additional information to include the tree belt to the north of the site within the site submission and also show how 40 dwellings could be provided along with green infrastructure and additional landscaping.

Full text:

We welcome the Council's assessment of site NLP 159 which demonstrated that there were no reasons why the site could not be considered further within the allocation process.
As noted in the site assessment framework, the landscape impacts of any proposal is thought to be a key consideration of any development coming forward. We have therefore produced a masterplan sketch demonstrating how this land could be developed to accommodate a minimum of 40 dwellings. We also wish to revise the site area for this site submission to include the tree belt to the north of the site which is also within the landowner's ownership. This increases the size of the site submission to approx. 2 ha of land. The inclusion of this land will allow the effective management and long term survival of the treebelt which will help maintain the landscape character of the area.

It is intended that the dwellings proposed will range from 2-4/5 bedroom properties.

The amended site and proposed site plan are attached for your information.

Comment

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 3169

Received: 29/08/2017

Respondent: ICP Asset Management Ltd

Agent: Dominic Lawson Bespoke Planning

Representation:

Please see document attached

Full text:

Please see document attached

Attachments:

Support

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 3609

Received: 29/08/2017

Respondent: Mr Peter Edwards

Representation:

I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Full text:

I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Support

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 3610

Received: 29/08/2017

Respondent: Mrs Susan Stevens

Representation:

ALP461. I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Full text:

ALP461. I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Support

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 3613

Received: 29/08/2017

Respondent: Mr Peter Edwards

Representation:

ALP 561. I believe that the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Full text:

ALP 561. I believe that the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Support

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 3615

Received: 29/08/2017

Respondent: Mrs Susan Stevens

Representation:

ALP475.I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development
on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Full text:

ALP475.I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development
on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Support

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 3617

Received: 29/08/2017

Respondent: Mr Peter Edwards

Representation:

ALP 475. I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely and fully support them.

Full text:

ALP 475. I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development on this site are absolutely and fully support them.

Support

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 3620

Received: 29/08/2017

Respondent: Mr Peter Edwards

Representation:

ALP 476. I believe the reasons given by CBC for refusing development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Full text:

ALP 476. I believe the reasons given by CBC for refusing development on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Support

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 3621

Received: 29/08/2017

Respondent: Mrs Susan Stevens

Representation:

ALP476.(Site B) I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development
on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Full text:

ALP476.(Site B) I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development
on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.

Support

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 3636

Received: 29/08/2017

Respondent: Mr Peter Edwards

Representation:

ALP461. I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development
on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.
(Please note I incorrectly sent a representation as above with the incorrect reference number of ALP561. My apologies, please ignore it!)

Full text:

ALP461. I believe the reasons given by CBC to refuse development
on this site are absolutely correct and fully support them.
(Please note I incorrectly sent a representation as above with the incorrect reference number of ALP561. My apologies, please ignore it!)

Comment

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 4266

Received: 29/08/2017

Respondent: ICP Asset Management Ltd

Agent: Dominic Lawson Bespoke Planning

Representation:

See attached concerning land at Moggerhanger.

Full text:

Please see document attached

Attachments:

Comment

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 5046

Received: 22/08/2017

Respondent: Red Eagle Securities

Agent: hd planning ltd

Representation:

NLP305

See attached documents for information regarding site layout,
can accommodate a minimum of 20 dwellings,
2-4/5 bedroom properties

Full text:

We welcome the Council's assessment of site NLP305 which demonstrated that there were no reasons why the site could not be considered further within the allocation process.
As noted in the site assessment framework, the landscape impacts of any proposal is thought to be a key consideration of any development coming forward. We have therefore produced a masterplan sketch demonstrating how this land could be developed to accommodate a minimum of 20 dwellings. We also wish to revise the site area for this site submission to include the tree belt to the north of the site which is also within the client's control. This increases the size of the site submission to approx. 1 ha of land. The inclusion of this land will allow the effective management and long term survival of the treebelt which will help maintain the landscape character of the area.

It is intended that the dwellings proposed will range from 2-4/5 bedroom properties.

The amended site and proposed site plan are attached for your information.

Comment

Site Assessment Forms (Housing)

Representation ID: 5047

Received: 22/08/2017

Respondent: Red Eagle Securities

Agent: hd planning ltd

Representation:

NLP159

Please see attachments for information on site layouts,
can accommodate a minimum of 40 dwellings,
revise site area to 2ha,

Full text:

We welcome the Council's assessment of site NLP 159 which demonstrated that there were no reasons why the site could not be considered further within the allocation process.
As noted in the site assessment framework, the landscape impacts of any proposal is thought to be a key consideration of any development coming forward. We have therefore produced a masterplan sketch demonstrating how this land could be developed to accommodate a minimum of 40 dwellings. We also wish to revise the site area for this site submission to include the tree belt to the north of the site which is also within the landowner's ownership. This increases the size of the site submission to approx. 2 ha of land. The inclusion of this land will allow the effective management and long term survival of the treebelt which will help maintain the landscape character of the area.

It is intended that the dwellings proposed will range from 2-4/5 bedroom properties.

The amended site and proposed site plan are attached for your information.