Infrastructure Delivery Plan
Comment
Technical Reports
Representation ID: 8459
Received: 18/02/2018
Respondent: Mrs Nicola Summers
*KEY ISSUE*
HARLINTON
INFRASTRUCTURE -We need infrastructure in Harlington to support the village growth.
07
I am a resident of Harlington and not necessarily against homes being built in my village. I understand the need but am concerned by the quantity of homes in the village. The facilities of Harlington just wont support such a growth. Having gone through the infrastructure plan there is nothing planned in the near future to address amenities. We are currently trying to fund our own playground which doesn't support the village in its current size. We have tried to get a football/cricket pavilion for years. I've lived here for 17 years and the village has grown in that time. We can support a little more but the plans look to increase the village by over 50%. There needs to be a compromise. There needs to be something offered to support the growth. That is what I would like to see
Comment
Technical Reports
Representation ID: 8850
Received: 20/02/2018
Respondent: Mrs Judith Bougas
*KEY ISSUE*
INFRASTRUCTURE - the plan has little reference to the additional pressure on the rail network with the increase in users. Arlesey Station has capacity issues, the design of the station needs reviewing. There is no clear and safe pedestrian crossing point at Arlesey Station.
07
Arlesey: The plan does not acknowledge the additional pressure on the rail network with the inevitable large number of new users. Already even 12 carriage trains are usually full after leaving Arlesey towards London. Additional services will be needed at peak times to cope with the higher numbers of people. The design of Arlesey station also needs reviewing. There is no clear and safe pedestrian crossing point from the station to the public street at peak times when large numbers of cars arrive to collect passengers.
Object
Technical Reports
Representation ID: 10319
Received: 22/02/2018
Respondent: Richard Landen
*KEY ISSUE*
INFRASTRUCTURE - all critical infrastructure lack any details and costings. Concern in relation to the viability of development at Land East of Biggleswade.
TRANSPORT - concern in relation to the impact of development on the East Coast Mainline and the associated infrastructure at Biggleswade Station, in the context of the East Biggleswade Development.
TRANSPORT - concern in relation to the impact of development at East of Biggleswade on the road network including the A1 and the rural road network towards Cambridge.
07
see attachment
Comment
Technical Reports
Representation ID: 11250
Received: 22/02/2018
Respondent: Highways England
*KEY ISSUE*
Highways England
INFRASTRUCTURE - concern that the IDP has not identified the specific schemes required to mitigate impacts on the strategic road network and the contributions expected from developments. There is concern in relation to the deliverability of sites.
07
See attachments
Comment
Technical Reports
Representation ID: 12068
Received: 22/02/2018
Respondent: O&H Properties Ltd
Agent: David Lock Associates
GENERAL - Appendix I and B include infrastructure associated with Marston Vale strategic site, this presents a danger of confusing the picture of infrastructure requirements.
INFRASTRUCTURE - careful consideration is required to the apportionment of the costs of infrastructure having regard to the impact of the development of each site and the phasing of infrastructure delivery.
INFRASTRUCTURE - the infrastructure requirements for Marston Vale new villages needs to be necessary and proportionate to the development.
07
see attachments