Transport Technical Paper [EXAM 114]

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Mr John Savill search

New search

Object

Transport Technical Paper [EXAM 114]

3. Appendix 1: Sustainable Transport in Central Bedfordshire

Representation ID: 14742

Received: 12/08/2020

Respondent: Mr John Savill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

In summary the Junction 13 traffic mitigation methods are flawed due to the methodology of the traffic forecasts failing to adequately consider the effect of the Oxford top Cambridge Expressway.

A02
P07
The traffic proposals agreed with Highways England on Junction 13 of the M1 and the proposals themselves are flawed. CBC cannot be relied on to deliver infrastructure, with specific reference to the Milton Keynes to Bedford waterway proposals as an example.

Change suggested by respondent:

It is unsound because the planning on traffic and mitigation methods for M1 Junction 13 are flawed. This junction is strategically important and the plan cannot be sound with a flaw such as this.

The traffic forecast needs to be revised to properly take the Oxford to Cambridge Expressway into account

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.