Table 9: SA Findings for Strategic Site Options in Area C

Showing comments and forms 1 to 1 of 1

Object

Sustainability Appraisal - Supplementary Report: Non-Technical Summary [EXAM 115A]

Representation ID: 14348

Received: 15/07/2020

Respondent: Mr Luke Anthony

Representation:

This doesn't make any sense. How is Employment support lower Marston Thrift... Or why does Marston Vale have ++, there is no basis for this. Why is there a ? mark on Marston Thrift but not Marston Vale, it would take 20 minutes to WALK between the two sites. Same for sustainable transport. Planned bus route through Marston Thrift. How can Marston Vale have any extra.

A03
P10
Raising concerns over evidence base inconsistencies regarding walking and sustainable transport in Marston Thrift and Marston Vale.

Change suggested by respondent:

It needs to be questioned how these results have been founded. independent studies do not find the same results, which is interesting.

Full text:

This doesn't make any sense. How is Employment support lower Marston Thrift... Or why does Marston Vale have ++, there is no basis for this. Why is there a ? mark on Marston Thrift but not Marston Vale, it would take 20 minutes to WALK between the two sites. Same for sustainable transport. Planned bus route through Marston Thrift. How can Marston Vale have any extra.